<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business Ethics Simplified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinnerlayer.softlayer.com/2007/business-ethics-simplified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinnerlayer.softlayer.com/2007/business-ethics-simplified/</link>
	<description>Do it faster. Do it better. Do it in private -- blog style.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: aoco</title>
		<link>http://theinnerlayer.softlayer.com/2007/business-ethics-simplified/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>aoco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerlayer.softlayer.com/2007/business-ethics-simplified/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>The funny thing is that you can remove any legal claims to pricing as well: If you are upfront and not defrauding someone, how can a price go against the law when someone is willing to pay it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is that you can remove any legal claims to pricing as well: If you are upfront and not defrauding someone, how can a price go against the law when someone is willing to pay it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Laude</title>
		<link>http://theinnerlayer.softlayer.com/2007/business-ethics-simplified/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Laude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerlayer.softlayer.com/2007/business-ethics-simplified/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>That quote reminds me of discussions I get in with my wife, essentially about how much you can analyze something until an event looks good or bad from a pure "maximizing my benefit" standpoint. Utilitarianism is fun to play around with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That quote reminds me of discussions I get in with my wife, essentially about how much you can analyze something until an event looks good or bad from a pure &#8220;maximizing my benefit&#8221; standpoint. Utilitarianism is fun to play around with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
